Recruiting & Staffing Automation Built for Agencies That Run on Margin

Your ATS, sourcing tools, and billing system should work as one pipeline. We install a production-grade Backbone that connects them - so every submittal, interview, and placement compounds into more margin, not more admin.

Get Your Efficiency Scorecard
Trusted by service businessesROI in 6 monthsYour stack, not ours
The Problem

Your ATS, sourcing tools, and billing system don't talk.

Candidates pasted from LinkedIn into the ATS by hand
Submittal docs rebuilt from scratch for every requisition
Interview scheduling chewing 30+ minutes per candidate
Time-to-fill data lives in someone's head, not a dashboard
Billable hours captured late or missed entirely
Every requisition becomes a relay race across Bullhorn, LinkedIn, ZoomInfo, Calendly, DocuSign, and QuickBooks. Recruiters live in tabs. Senior people redo the same submittal prep every day.
Our Approach

One Backbone that connects every step of the staffing cycle.

We install a production-grade automation Backbone on top of your existing stack - no rip-and-replace. Each step of the candidate-to-placement cycle feeds the next, with audit trails the agency owner can actually trust.
ATS, sourcing, comms, and billing connected through one orchestration layer
Submittals generated from candidate data in seconds, not 30 minutes
Interview scheduling handled by an agent, not a coordinator
Time-to-fill, submittal velocity, and margin live on one dashboard
Built on n8n + native APIs, not consumer-grade glue

Margin is the product. We protect it.

Recruiting agencies don't have the headcount to absorb broken tooling. Our job is to make every recruiter 30-40% more productive without forcing them to learn a new stack.

What We Automate for Staffing Agencies

Six modules covering the full candidate-to-placement cycle. Each one ships in production and feeds the next.

Example Results

What changes in 60-90 days

before (PER MONTH)
after (PER MONTH)
Submittal prep time
30-45 min
3-5 min
-85%
Candidate-to-interview ratio
1 in 8
1 in 4
+100%
Days-to-fill (avg req)
32 days
21 days
-34%
Billable hours captured
78%
97%
+24%

The Staffing Automation Backbone

One deep module + two integration layers. Together they replace the tab-juggling that's eating your recruiters' day.

The Staffing Automation Backbone

The connected core that runs the candidate-to-placement cycle:

ATS-to-Email Sync

Every candidate touch logged automatically against the right req. Recruiters stop maintaining a parallel inbox. The ATS becomes the single source of truth without anyone forcing it.

Submittal Doc Generation

Branded packets built from ATS data, refreshed every time a candidate's record changes. Same format, every recruiter, every client - no more 'whose template was that?'

Time-to-Fill Reporting

Live dashboards showing req age, submittal velocity, interview funnel, and offer-acceptance rate. Owners see margin compression early, not at month-end.

Candidate Re-engagement

Automated nurture for placed contractors approaching roll-off, plus dormant candidates we've already vetted. Your existing pipeline produces more placements without more outreach.

Margin Dashboards

GP per req, recruiter productivity, client-level margin trends. The numbers an owner actually wants to see on a Monday morning, refreshed automatically from your ATS and accounting stack.

Tool Stack Integration

We don't make you switch ATS. We build native-first integrations across Bullhorn, JobAdder, Crelate, Loxo, and your existing sourcing, comms, billing, and scheduling tools. If a tool has an API, we connect it. If it doesn't, we know which ones do.

Compliance & Audit Trail

Every candidate action timestamped, every doc generation logged, every data export controlled. GDPR, CCPA, and client-specific data agreements respected by design. The audit trail you need when a client asks 'who sent that?'

How We Install It

Four weeks from kickoff to live Backbone. Each phase delivers value before the next one starts.

  1. 1

    Step 1. Discovery Workshop

    Half-day session mapping your current candidate-to-placement cycle, tool by tool. We surface where hours leak, which integrations are broken, and which placements you almost lost because something fell through a crack. Output: a prioritized automation roadmap.

  2. 2

    Step 2. Map the Cycle

    We document the actual req lifecycle as it runs today - not the version on your SOP. Every handoff, every tool, every manual step. This is the audit no agency owner has time to do themselves.

  3. 3

    Step 3. Build the Backbone (28 days)

    We install the foundation modules over four weeks: ATS-to-email sync, submittal generation, scheduling, and the margin dashboard. Built on production infrastructure with monitoring and rollback. Your team keeps working through the build.

  4. 4

    Step 4. Live Switch

    We migrate active reqs to the new flow over a single day. Old workflows stay running in parallel for a week as fallback. Recruiter training is built into the rollout - no separate enablement day.

  5. 5

    Step 5. Ongoing Expansion

    Monthly retainer covers monitoring, optimization, and expansion. We add modules as you grow - redeployment, advanced sourcing agents, client-portal reporting. The Backbone compounds; it doesn't reset.

Get Your Efficiency Scorecard
AI automation agency 4-step implementation process: Map, Design, Build, Monitor

What agencies say

We cut submittal prep from 35 minutes to under 4. The recruiters got their afternoons back and we placed two extra reqs the first month. That's the whole pitch.
Managing Partner 12-person executive search firm (anonymized)

Why 2V

What Makes 2V Different for Staffing Agencies

20+ years of engineering

We're not a recruiter who learned Zapier. We're production engineers who learned recruiting by fixing it for agencies your size. Our systems hold up under real load.

No rip-and-replace

Keep Bullhorn, JobAdder, Crelate, or whatever you run. We build on top of your stack, not against it. Switching ATS in a staffing agency is a six-month tax - we won't recommend it unless it's the only path.

Agency-margin economics

Our pricing is calibrated for agency P&Ls. Foundation Backbone $7K-$13K one-time, retainers from $1K/month. We only take work where we can prove ROI in six months.

Your stack, not ours

We don't sell you our platform. There is no 2V platform. Everything we build runs in your accounts, on your subscriptions, owned by you. If we part ways, the systems stay yours.

Retainer, not project bill

Agencies need ongoing engineering, not one-shot builds. Our retainers cover monitoring, optimization, and new module builds. Most clients add 3-5 modules in year one without renegotiating scope.

Stack Coverage

Tools We Connect To

We've built into 137 tools in production. Staffing agencies typically run 8-12 of these - we wire them as one system.

ATS
BullhornJobAdderCrelateLoxoVincereRecruiterflow
SOURCING
LinkedIn RecruiterZoomInfoApolloSeekOuthireEZ
COMMS
SlackGmailTeamsTwilio SMSWhatsApp
SCHEDULING
CalendlyGoodTimeChili PiperGoogle Calendar
BILLING
QuickBooksXeroStripeBill.com
DOCS & E-SIGN
DocuSignPandaDocGoogle DriveEgnyte

Engagement & Pricing

We work in two phases: a Foundation Backbone build, then ongoing Expansion on retainer. Every engagement starts with the Efficiency Scorecard so you see the ROI math before you commit.

Our service tiers are calibrated to recruiting and staffing agency P&Ls - not enterprise SaaS budgets. If we can't show payback in six months, we don't take the project.

  • Foundation Backbone build: $7K-$13K one-time, 28 days from kickoff to live
  • Discovery workshop: $2K credited back into the Foundation if you proceed
  • Ongoing Expansion retainer: from $1K/month, scaling to $6.5K for full-coverage engineering
  • Custom modules: priced per scope, almost always inside an active retainer

See /tools/roi-calculator for a fast payback estimate based on your headcount.

Free Efficiency Scorecard - see the ROI math before you commit.

Get Your Efficiency Scorecard

Frequently Asked Questions

If you have a question, chances are you'll find the answer below.

Do you replace our ATS or work with what we have?

We work with what you have in 95% of cases. Bullhorn, JobAdder, Crelate, Loxo, Vincere, Recruiterflow - all native-first integrations. Switching ATS is a six-month tax we only recommend if the current platform is actually blocking your growth.

Can you automate sourcing without breaking LinkedIn TOS?

Yes. We work with official LinkedIn Recruiter and Sales Navigator APIs and integration partners (SeekOut, hireEZ, Apollo, ZoomInfo). We don't scrape - it gets seats banned and we've seen it happen to other agencies. Compliant sourcing is the only kind worth building.

How do you handle candidate data privacy and GDPR?

Every system we build has data-access controls, audit logging, and retention rules baked in from day one. We've shipped under GDPR, CCPA, and client-specific data agreements. Candidate data stays in your accounts and your ATS - we don't move it into a 2V platform because there isn't one.

What's a realistic time-to-fill improvement?

20-35% reduction is typical in 60-90 days once the Backbone is live. The wins come from faster submittals, automated scheduling, and re-engagement of already-vetted candidates. We won't promise specific numbers without seeing your data - the scorecard surfaces what's realistic for your funnel.

Can you integrate with Bullhorn / JobAdder / Crelate?

Yes. We've shipped production integrations against all three plus Loxo, Vincere, and Recruiterflow. Bullhorn's REST API is our most-used ATS endpoint. See our HR workflow automation guide for how we approach ATS automation.

How fast can we go live?

Foundation Backbone ships in 28 days from kickoff. Discovery workshop the week before, then four weeks of build with a single-day live switch. Your team keeps working on the existing flow through the build - no downtime.

What happens when our process changes - do we have to rebuild?

No. The Backbone is built on n8n + native APIs, with documented workflows you can read. When your process shifts, we update modules under retainer. Most agencies change 2-3 modules per year as they grow; the underlying Backbone is stable.

Do you support contingent + retained search workflows?

Yes. We build both into the same Backbone with conditional logic per engagement type. Contingent reqs run the high-velocity sourcing/submittal flow; retained search runs the slower, more controlled cycle with scorecard automation and client-portal reporting.

Start here

Start with Your Efficiency Scorecard

The scorecard shows you where your staffing agency leaks hours and margin, which Backbone modules would deliver the highest ROI, and whether we're the right fit to install them. Ten minutes - actionable findings whether we work together or not.

Or browse /solutions/hr-automation for the in-house HR view, /solutions/sales-automation for the deal-flow analog, or our AI automation guide for the full picture.

Get Your Efficiency Scorecard